‘The most quoted poem in the English language’

The above, which actually is a genuine poem of mine, owes a debt to Don DeLillo, his novel White Noise, and the most photographed barn in America. Credit where credit’s due.
M.

The above, which actually is a genuine poem of mine, owes a debt to Don DeLillo, his novel White Noise, and the most photographed barn in America. Credit where credit’s due.
M.

I’ve often wondered what might have happened if Rebecca had been written by Agatha Christie instead of Daphne Du Maurier. Maybe it would have ended like this…
__________
“Mesdames, Messieurs,” said the dapper little Belgian. “Thank you all for coming here at my invitation. I apologise for incommoding you. I would have preferred to have assembled you at Monsieur de Winter’s home at Manderley, but unfortunately the recent conflagration has prevented that. I hope that you have made yourself as comfortable as one may be here in the room where the inquest into Madame de Winter’s death was held.”
Poirot moved a few paces to his right, stopped, and turned to face the company. Every eye was on him. The company, seated or standing, looked at him expectantly; he, in his turn looked at them.
“We are here to reveal the late Madame de Winter’s murderer,” he said. At that there were gasps and cries of “What?” Colonel Julyan rose to his feet.
“I say, look here, Moosior Poirot,” he objected. “Rebecca de Winter’s death was suicide. The facts bear that out. The finding of the inquest was unequivocal and the evidence was conclusive. The lady took her own life. Do you now dispute that?”
“Mon cher Colonel, I do not for one moment dispute either the facts or the evidence,” said the detective mildly. “I merely dispute the interpretation put upon them. If you and the ladies and gentlemen here will hear me out with patience, then I, Poirot, will reveal to you what actually happened on the day Madame de Winter died, and why.”
The room fell silent again, and Poirot continued. “There can be no doubt that the late Madame de Winter did not die by her own hand, that she in fact was murdered. Furthermore, Mesdames et Messieurs, there is no doubt that the person by whose hand she did died is, at this very moment, here in this room!”
Again there were gasps, glances were shot from one person to the next, and a babble of questions were directed at Poirot. He held up a manicured hand.
“S’il vous plait, s’il vous plait. Poirot will reveal all to you, I promise that in a very short time all mystery will be cleared away, everything that can be made known to you, shall be made known. But first, I have asked Chief Inspector Japp of Scotland Yard to be with us…” Poirot raised his voice slightly as he mentioned the Chief Inspector’s name, and that very person entered the room making his way to the Belgian’s side. “… in case his presence should be needed. Now then, Mesdames et Messieurs, to the matter of the crime about which Poirot has been exercising the little grey cells. There is more than one of you who had reason to resent the late Rebecca de Winter, and perhaps that resentment might have – how do you say? – boiled over into a rage of homicide. For example you… Monsieur Favell.”
“Damn you, you detestable little frog,” snapped Jack Favell, grinding out his cigarette. “I’ve good mind to throttle you where you stand! I loved Rebecca.”
“Where Poirot stands, he stands!” said the Belgian, ignoring both Favell’s insult and its inaccuracy. “You show sufficient anger to be capable of murder perhaps. Indeed you did love the lady, but how often do we see love and jealousy go hand in hand? For certainment she had other lovers – a crime passionelle would not have been impossible. However I believe that you lack the courage. Your way is to creep around, not to confront – your surreptitious visit to Manderley to see Madame Danvers when Monsieur de Winter was absent shows as much. Non, you are not the murderer. Shall we see who else might have a motive. Perhaps Monsieur Crawley, the estate manager.”
Frank Crawley raised his eyebrows in surprise.
“You, Monsieur Crawley, are the devoted friend and faithful employee of Monsieur de Winter. You have worked for him for many years, taking care of the estate for which you yourself have much love. And yet – Poirot is correct, is he not? – Madame Rebecca once made the romantic overture to you. You could not stand the thought that one day the estate that you loved would come into her hands, the hands of a woman who would deceive her husband, your friend.”
“By George, you’re right!” said Frank Crawley. “She did, just the once. I was shocked, I can tell you, and for a good while I had my doubts about the kind of woman she was. But if she was unfaithful to Mr de Winter she managed to conceal it well enough from me, and I thought it had been an isolated… mistake.”
“Oh, but isolated it was not,” said Poirot. “Again am I not correct, Major Lacey?”
Major Lacey turned red, looked down, and mumbled something.
“Good grief, Giles!” exclaimed Beatrice Lacey.
“But again, there is not enough there to light a spark from which murder can burst into flame,” said Poirot. “Leaving aside the late Madame de Winter’s flirtings, there is at least one person present to whom she was deliberately and viciously cruel – le pauvre Monsieur Ben.”
Ben, standing at the back of the room, his battered hat clutched in his hand, realised that he was being spoken about. There has panic in his eyes.
“I didn’t do nothing,” he said, piteously. “Don’t send me to the asylum… I don’t want to go to the asylum…”
Poirot’s look was kindly. “Have no fear, Monsieur Ben,” he said, gently. “No one will ever send you to that dreadful place which you fear so much. As you say, you did nothing. You do not have the necessary skill to pilot a boat, to sink it, to return to the shore, and to cause to disappear all the evidence of this. Non, Monsieur Ben, the one person who ever threatened you with that dreadful place is gone, never to return.”
“She’s gone, that one,” said Ben.
“I shall make sure Ben is provided for, sir,” interjected Frank Crawley. Poirot made a short bow towards him, and continued.
“Who else is there who had motive or opportunity? Frith, the butler, standing there in our presence? Non, I can reveal that the butler did not do it. In fact, the finding of the inquest, it was almost correct. It is possible to say that the late Madame de Winter did indeed kill herself. Rather than suffer the wreck of her youthfulness and beauty, rather than die in pain from the fatal disease from which, we now know, she was suffering, she walked up to and stared into the face of her death, at the hands of you… Monsieur de Winter.”
“I knew it!” cried Jack Favell, jumping to his feet as Chief Inspector Japp moved swiftly to intercept him and push him back down into his chair. “Max, you swine! It was you all along.”
Maxim de Winter rose from his chair, and his young, rather dowdy second wife rose with him. He stood, his eyes steady on Poirot’s. “Go on,” he said, and Poirot, returning his steady gaze, did so.
“On the day in question you confronted your late wife in the boathouse cottage. There she taunted you about her infidelities – about which you already knew – but this time perhaps her taunts were insupportable, perhaps she said she would break her word, her promise of silence, and ruin your reputation and your family name. All the anger and resentment that you had held inside, at that moment it became too much to bear. You took up a gun and you shot her through the heart. After that you carried the body to the boat, piloted it out into the bay, spiked the hull, opened the sea-cocks, and rowed back to shore in the dinghy. You made sure that there was no evidence of the shooting in the boathouse. When a drowned woman was found later, you took the opportunity to identify her as your wife, even though you knew she was not – that was no mistake. No one would have known, had it not been for the shipwreck and for the discovery by the diver of your late wife’s boat. There, is Poirot not correct?”
“Say nothing, Maxim,” said Mrs de Winter, her voice quiet but firm.
Japp stepped forward. “Maximilian de Winter, I’m arresting you…” Poirot’s hand was on his arm, and the puzzled policeman stopped in mid-sentence.
“Not possible, mon cher Japp,” he said. “If indeed Monsieur de Winter remains silent, makes no confession, there is not one shred of material evidence against him. The bullet which killed his late wife passed through her body without leaving any mark upon her skeleton, and although the exercise of Poirot’s little grey cells is, as ever, impeccable, I must admit that without Monsieur de Winter’s confession there is no case. Even the accessory after the fact, the second Madame de Winter cannot be touched by the law. Oh yes, Madame, you have known for some time. Your fainting fit at the inquest, just at the moment when your husband’s testimony was beginning to appear shaky, it was most convenient. But it did not deceive Poirot! Enfin, you were about to leave for Southampton, if you go now you will still be in time to catch your steamer. Do not stand there – go! Go before Poirot changes his mind and gives you into the hands of the good Chief Inspector!”
Maxim de Winter seemed about to say something, but his little wife had caught his sleeve, her eyes as hard as steel. Without another word they both left the room.
“Look here, Poirot, this won’t do!” said Chief Inspector Japp, rounding on him. “You had a murderer and an accessory right here and you let them off scot free!”
“Scot free, mon cher Japp? Mais non. I have condemned them to a life sentence. Maxim de Winter is deprived of the house he loved, and the childlike qualities of his second wife, which so endeared her to him, have gone for ever. Their life together will be a prison of conjugal ennui. But resume your seats Mesdames et Messieurs, because there is another crime to consider – the burning down of Manderley.”
“Surely that was an accident, a fault with an electric lamp or something, wasn’t it?” asked Colonel Julyan.
“Non, mon Colonel, it was most certainly an act of arson.”
“Oh, I’ll put my hand up to that one,” said Jack Favell, taking a cigarette from its case and tapping it on the lid. “I always was a little careless with a cigarette lighter.”
Poirot turned to him and gave a weak smile. “Non, Monsieur Favell, it was not you. You could not have returned from the visit to Doctor Baker, when Madame Rebecca’s illness became known, in time to set the house ablaze before the de Winters returned. Impossible for a man to drive that fast and to take the correct route when he is – how do you say? – so well acquainted with a hip flask. But on this occasion you make perhaps an uncharacteristically generous gesture, one of protection, because you have guessed what Poirot has guessed, and you seek to protect someone of whom you are fond, someone who has always been on your side, someone whom no doubt you telephoned after the meeting with Doctor Baker. Madame Danvers, I must address my next remarks to you.”
The housekeeper sat rigid on her chair, her hands gripping the arms, an expression of utter hatred in her eyes as she looked at Poirot.
“You had disappeared, Madame, and we would not have found you had you not tried to sell some of the late Madame de Winter’s jewellery.”
“She gave me those, before she died. Keepsakes, presents,” said the housekeeper, through clenched teeth. “They were mine to do with as I pleased.”
“Perhaps, perhaps,” said the little Belgian. “The ownership of the jewels is of no importance. For a time, you were under suspicion for the murder, but your devotion to the lady was too great for that crime. The arson, however, is another matter. The fire began and had its greatest intensity in the east wing, in the bedroom of the second Madame de Winter, whose presence you resented, and whom you once tried to persuade to commit suicide. This was a crime of hate, an attempt to blot out all trace of the woman who had usurped the place of the one to whom you were so devoted. Again, is Poirot not correct?”
“Evangeline Danvers, I am arresting you… oh for heaven’s sake, Poirot, what now?”
Poirot had gently interposed himself between the policeman and the housekeeper, shaking his head. “Once more, mon cher Japp, unless Madame Danvers cares to confess, there is no material evidence. Well, Madame, do you wish to – please pardon the expression – make the clean breast of it?”
Getting to her feet, Mrs Danvers merely said, “Rot in hell – all of you!”, turned, and left the room.
“Wait for me, Danny,” called Jack Favell, following her.
“Poirot, I must say this is a bad show all round,” said Chief Inspector Japp with not a little irritation. “You got me down here with assurance of murder and arson, and now I have to go back to the Yard empty handed. If you’ll excuse me, ladies and gentlemen, I have a train to catch.”
“I give you this assurance, mon cher Japp,” said Poirot with a smile. “None of the people who committed a crime have escaped. At the very least they will wake up each night from dreams of the wreck of their lives, and of the burned shell of the great house of Manderley!”
“Moosior Poirot,” said Colonel Julyan, when everyone else had gone. “What will you do now. I for one would like to hear more about some of the cases which you have solved – professional interest, you know, as a magistrate. Can I persuade you to stay in Kerrith for a while longer? The local food they serve at the inn has a first class reputation.”
Poirot politely declined. “Alas, mon Colonel, I believe I ought to take also the London train, and make my peace with the good Chief Inspector. But I thank you for the kind invitation. Another time, perhaps, when you next visit London.”
Bowing and handing the Colonel his card, Poirot left. As he made for the station he sighed with relief. He thought, “I shall escape from this Cornwall – ses brouillards, ses orages, ses naufrages! – and most especially from the prospect of having to endure its cuisine. Oh those gastronomically detestable – how do they call them? – pasties!”

“I’m not a scientist and I’m not a mathematician,” a friend said to me. “I’m a philosopher. So when my daughter – she was of primary school age at the time – asked me what there was before time, I told her this: ‘Time is simply a measurement of the rate of change; for when there was no such thing as time, you have to imagine a state of things which is absolutely static, nothing moves, nothing changes, nothing can be understood to exist.’ That satisfied her for the time being – at least it made her silent on the subject.”
He went on. “Scientists are talking about the universe existing as information, and that that information is contained, stored, located at the event of a black hole. Thus the information is in two-dimensional form. However, the universe as it is perceived is three-dimensional. A three-dimensional object generated from two-dimensional information is holographic, therefore the possibility exists that the universe is a gigantic hologram. That being so, it could be a simulation. But of what, and initiated by whom? However, I see a flaw in that, and it’s a big one. If the event of a black hole is two-dimensional, then it has no depth whatsoever, it is simply where two different states – call them zones if you like – meet. If it has no depth, if it is simply where two discrete things meet, how can it be said to exist? If it does not exist, how can it hold information, how can it hold anything? If it holds something, it must exist. If it exists discretely, it can’t simply be where two zones abut. It has to have depth, no matter how small that depth is. If it has depth it is three-dimensional, not two-dimensional. Therefore the universe is not holographic.”
It seems to me that ever since the great Voltaire lampooned and overturned the optimistic principle of a priori in favour of the rational a posteriori, science has been trying to bump things back the way they were before. Well, maybe not precisely ever since, but at least since Einstein told us that the laws of the universe were the same at any point in space or time. That must mean that they existed, in all their complexity, an infinitesimal moment after the big bang, and that they have governed everything that has happened since. The scientists who propose that we are a holographic simulation – and who will probably be able to point out the flaw in my pointing out the flaw in their thinking – must also propose that the parameters of the simulation have governed, a priori, everything that has happened, is happening, or will happen.
As I sit here in my lifeboat in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, I am looking at the forward section, covered by a tarpaulin. Under the tarpaulin there is a tiger. The tiger may or may not be alive, or may be simultaneously alive, under the Copenhagen interpretation rather than the tarpaulin. Or it might simultaneously be under the tarpaulin and the Copenhagen interpretation…
If I, or the tiger, ever get out of this situation, then there’s a novel in this. Maybe even a blockbuster film. Knowing my luck someone will have already beaten me to it by the time I reach land.

I have reorganised things on this site ever so slightly, and now all the short stories I have posted here can be accessed from a single tag. You can find them here – the first ten are displayed, and you’ll find a link to others at the bottom of the page. Enjoy!
M
Curl Up and Burn
short story by Samuel Snoek-Brown
http://eunoiareview.wordpress.com/2013/02/03/curl-up-and-burn/
review by Marie Marshall

Kendall County Courthouse, Texas.
I would not normally review a short story, but this particular one by Sam Snoek-Brown is ten-thousand-or-so words long, and if the narrative were expanded it would start to knock on the door of novella. However, a short story it is, lean of excessive development and sharply focused. That leanness pulls us along and makes sure our attention is not diverted.
The subject matter is a ‘statutory rape’ case in Texas, its effects on the community and the persons involved, and its aftermath. The story’s style of presentation is one of reportage. It is written as if it is a magazine article. The narrator is as detached and non-judgmental as an investigative reporter, but his presence ‘interviewing’ and interacting with the personae of the story allows their character to be drawn out. The cut-and-paste nature of the narrative allows it to be episodic, which accentuates that drawing-out – for example, the meeting between the narrator and the convicted man’s father, the latter’s pickup blocking the road, a shotgun pointedly on display on the gun-rack, is loaded with tension and menace.
Another thing that this episodic treatment enables is a presentation of the ‘facts’ in a non-linear way. The fact that a man has been convicted of statutory rape and has served twelve years in a tough prison is made known very early in the story. The details of the case are revealed, but not necessarily in chronological sequence. Rather they are cut with historical detail, sections of modern supposed interviews with townsfolk, and with descriptions of the protagonist’s drives around his home town, where he and the crime of which he has been convicted are well-known, and of his obsession with building and maintaining a model of the town in which things he observes in everyday life modify the layout. Essentially there is no final resolution to the story, but we do realise that a story has been told. The protagonist’s final statement is terse, almost threatening in tone, but remains enigmatic.
Adding to the air of reportage is the research, including historical research, that the author has pasted into the story. The story is set in a real town in Texas – the author himself was brought up in Texas and can therefore be relied upon to give the setting an air of authenticity. Of course his storytelling style does take over from the journalistic style in places, notably in the descriptions of the protagonist’s run-in with his Nemesis, a local Deputy, and the title is a storyteller’s title, not a journalist’s.
I have a couple of niggles – no story is perfect, let’s face it. Firstly there is much made of a teenage girl’s ‘chatting on the internet’; I don’t know whether Texas was a long way ahead of us (I’m writing this from the point of view of a British reader), but in the early 1990s, when this was supposed to have taken place, chatrooms and emails were not as common as they now are, and most households, if they had a computer, were on a dial-up system for the internet, which took up phone time and therefore parents’ money. I could be out-of-touch, but this detail momentarily halted my ride through the story. Secondly, the girl in question is Chinese-American, and whilst her father has the English given name John, her full name appears to be wholly Cantonese. When a Chinese character appears in a work be a non-Chinese writer, I often wonder – maybe unfairly, I’ll grant you – whether her name has been plucked out of the air. I put the name of this character into an image search engine and came up with pictures of a male boxer. Like I said, these are only niggles, and could be my own reading quirks.
When it comes down to it, this is a compelling story, excellently written and insightful, moral but not moralistic. Sam Snoek-Brown is a tireless craftsman of the short story, and Curl Up and Burn shows that he has been working out.

Was it a year ago now, since last we piped in the great chieftain o’ the pudding race, that we raised an amber dram, that we all gave a hearty slainte mhath! There was one braw lad whose eyes were twinkling with glee and single malt, who rose and recited – without a prompt – the auld tale of Tam o’ Shanter, the skellum the blethering, blustering, drunken blellum. Aye, aye, and how we laughed, how we all chorused “Weel done, Cutty Sark!” And how we cheered on old Tam was he whipped Maggie his mare towards Doon Water and the Brig, held our breath at the last loup of Nannie the witch to grab the mare’s tale as Tam won to the key-stane o’ the brig, and yes, how we let it all out with a big gasp when he was hame and free. More, how we winked and smiled and nodded at each other when our impromptu Makar wagged his finger and said:
Noo, wha this tale o’ truth shall read.
Ilk man and mother’s son, take heed;
Whene’er to drink you are inclined,
Or cutty sarks run in your mind,
Think! Ye may buy joys o’er dear –
Remember Tam o’ Shanter’s mare.
Aye, aye, and we clapped and cheered of course, and shouted out, “More! More!” – and of course there is no more, for no one, least of all our national Bard, ever wrote The Further Adventures of Tam o’ Shanter. But of course the moment passed, and then someone got up and sang My Love Is Like A Red, Red Rose to which we all listened in silent transport, some of us with our eyes upturned in wistful sadness as we remembered the Joes and Jeannies of our youth. And at the end of the evening we all declared “A Man’s A Man For A’ That” as we shook each other by the hand.
That was a night, but then it always is, isn’t it.
Look, let me tell you something I heard. How Tam o’ Shanter came to be written. The tale may surprise you for many reasons. I heard the story from someone, and they heard it from someone in Ayr who heard it from someone in Mauchline who heard it from someone in Tarbolton. And that person from Tarbolton heard it from his grannie, and… well, you get the picture. Each one swears that it is a true story.
Firstly you must forget Alloway Kirk and the Brig o’ Doon. The story didn’t happen there. Imagine instead a man riding slowly along a country road, on his way to his farm at Mossgiel, his mare plodding hoof-after-hoof, he himself in a sober brown-study – aye, sober! No drunken blellum he, but a serious, sullen, frowning man, a young man who would have been handsome but for his scowl. He has come from a Lodge meeting in Mauchline where he had been passed over for advancement to one of the Craft’s arcane and worshipful positions, and passed over in favour of one more lately come to the brotherhood. However, remembering that concord should prevail amongst Brother Masons, he had transferred the resentment in his mind to other things. We may suppose his thoughts to have run somewhat along the following lines:
“Farming is a business for fools and dullards. Nothing good ever came out of a farm. Let my brother Gilbert work the farm to his heart’s content, let him whistle behind the plough, let him sow and harrow and reap and stack, let him break his back on the hard work – I have done my share of labouring since I was wee, and enough is enough! I am a poet, and I am a good one, and I should be kent as one; but no one will buy my verses. My curse on all publishers. How good it would be if there was some agency, natural or supernatural, by which poetry appeared in print on its merit alone, and did not depend on the whims and low tastes of publishers. Ah, and if I was mair kent then the lasses would look upon me and love me. Finding a love would be less of a trial and more of a sport.” And so on, and so on.
This resentment smoldered and kept hot in his mind, to the extent that he missed his way. He turned left before Tarbolton Kirk when he should have turned left at Tarbolton Kirk, but as the evening darkened he was well past the loanings to Hallrig and to Spittalside before he realized his mistake. He found himself approaching a meeting-of-ways that he did not recognize as the gloaming-light faded. He looked about him, and his frown did not improve. He was about to turn his mare round and ride back towards Tarbolton when the sound of some music reached his ears from across a field. He turned his head towards where he thought the sound came from, and for a while he could see nothing; but then there was a faint, greenish-yellow, bobbing light, as though a torchbearer was picking his way across a field. Then the light became two lights, the two became four, the four eight, and so they multiplied until it seemed as though a procession of torchbearers wound its way along the further edge of the field. All the while there was the wail of small-pipes playing a slow air in time to which the torchbearers marched.
Then their torches threw light upon some old walls and ruined towers, and upon a dour, square house of stone. The marchers passed in and out amongst the buildings, touching their torches to flambeaux in sconces, to braziers, and at last to a great bonfire, and against all this light the young man could see those walls now as squares of oblongs of shadows.
“Why this must be the old monastery ruins and castle of Fail,” he thought to himself. “But surely there have been no monks here since before the days of the Covenanters, and surely also no one has lived at the old castle – if you could call such a meager block a castle – for generations, not since the ill-reputed Laird died while old King James was still a bairn. That’s more than two centuries syne.”
Curiosity now overcame the young man’s former emotions. He looped the reins of his mare round the limb of a tree, climbed over a low stone fence, and made his way cautiously across the field towards the light and the music. The small-pipes were playing a jauntier tune now, and voices were joining in, not so much singing as chanting to the rhythm of the tune. He reached the outer wall of the monastery ruins and carefully peeked around them. What he saw made his jaw drop. His first thought was to take flight – aye and it would have been better for him if he had! There was only one word to describe the beings who had marched to that place by torchlight.
Witches!
I know, I know, that’s not a word we are supposed to use these days for fear of offending someone. Och there’s aye something to keep us from speaking the truth! Let me say then that these wights, these nighttime revelers, were as far away from the honest wiccans and pagans of today as it is possible to be. They were further still from the old storybook witches with their pointy hats and flying besoms. There is no better way to say what they were if not witches and warlocks, except perhaps that “the earth hath bubbles, as the water has, and these are of them.” So profound their evil, so eldritch their craft, so obscene their practices, so loathsome the object of their worship, so deep, so dark, so full of mortal danger…
As with all true evil, however, there was something fascinating and beguiling about them, a web of enchantment that even they wove without being conscious of it. The impulse to flee that had briefly come upon the young man died as quickly as it had appeared, and was replaced by a stronger curiosity than had first lured him to that spot. He stayed, he watched, enthralled even as disgust rose within him to battle with the thrall. The throng of this conventicle – it must have been a veritable synod of covens! – milled around a stone table, an altar dark-stained and cracked. Onto it they placed the burdens, offerings and sacrifices they had brought with them, or other foul objects wrenched from the freshly-breached tombs within those ruined walls. The young man made a ghastly catalogue of them in his mind:
A murders’s banes in gibbet-airns;
Twa span-lang, wee, unchristen’d bairns;
A thief, new-cutted frae a rape,
Wi’ his last gasp his gab did gape;
Five tomahawks, wi’ blude red-rusted;
Five scymitars, wi’ murder crusted;
A garter, which a babe had strangled;
A knife, a father’s throat had mangled…
… and so on, and so on, you know them all as well as I do, I have no doubt. When these had all been placed in a horrid tangle, the piper struck up another tune, a lively reel, and the company began to dance. The young man could just make out the piper sitting in an alcove, seven feet or more up a wall. He was a darker shadow in the dark, as though the light from the fires and torches could not reach him. Yet still the young man could tell that the piper’s fingers worked and worked at the chanter of his small-pipes, and the tune that came forth was lively, almost cheery, though there was mockery in its cheerfulness. As the witches and warlocks danced around the great table, the young man felt his own feet tapping to the tune. The reel gave way to a jig, rattling skirls and triplets rippled from the pipes, and the ghastly crowd flung themselves into their dancing, panting, sweating, shedding clothes as they whirled. Tongues lolled, eyes glazed with madness, spittle flew from their lips as the tune changed again to a wild slip-jig. One by one the witches and warlocks began to fall in exhausted stupors or trances until only a handful were left dancing, all hideous hags – except for one.
Louping higher than the rest, whirling and spinning with an uncanny vigour, her eyes bright, her face shining in ecstasy, was a young lass, stripped to her brief petticoat. The young man could not keep his eyes from her, nor his lascivious thoughts from her bare legs, or from what else might have been scarcely hidden.
“I ken her!” The sudden thought came to him. “Damn me but I ken her! That, unless I am mad, is the daughter of Brother McDowell from Mauchline. Aye, it is, it is. It’s young Nannie. Nannie whom I met at McDowell’s house on two, no, three occasions last year. Why, she must be no more than eighteen years old – and she’s here at a witch’s Sabbath?” Then he began to recall the looks that Nannie had given to him during those three visits. When he had looked at her directly she had lowered her eyes demurely, but once or twice he had caught her looking at him, just a swift, sideways glance. Now the awfulness of the scene began to lose its effect on him. Instead he looked at Nannie and saw not a witch cavorting round a horror-laden altar, but a wild thing, a beautiful thing, a filly or a young deer springing from crag to crag, an object of lust… no, of love!
All the remaining dancers except for Nannie dropped to the floor, and propelled by some new insanity the young man dashed out from behind the wall, louped into the middle of the blazing light, and seized Nannie by her hands. For a time which might have been an hour or a second, they danced and louped together in a frenzy, more a single being than two. Then –
“Weel done, Cutty-sark!” yelled the young man. “Weel done, Cutty-sark!”
Whatever spell had bound them momentarily was shattered by those words. The piping stopped. All was silence. Nannie crouched like a wild cat waiting to spring, her eyes no longer shining with the pleasure of the dance, but hard, dark, feral. All around him the exhausted witches and warlocks propped themselves on their elbows as though about to rise. Some eyes turned to the alcove where the piper sat. The young man stood, wishing he could cast a line around the seconds that had just past, haul them in, make it so they had never happened. In that moment of great peril, while all was yet still, he took hold of his chance, turned, and ran!
As he sped across the field it was only terror that made him turn his head to look behind. He caught glimpses. Witches and warlocks all in a guddle, tripping over each other in their haste, some grabbing knives and hatchets from the altar, some already running after him. At the head of the pursuit was Nannie, the hands that he had held in their dancing stretched before her like claws. No more tripping and stumbling now, they were all after him, Nannie in the van and the dark piper at the rear. The young man threw himself onto his mare’s back, whipped her and kicked her flanks with his heels, and she started away with less than a heartbeat to spare. Off she galloped, her hooves clattering on the road, the shrieking mob of witches and warlocks after her. Man, man could they run! Their devilish zeal, their anger at the disruption of their Sabbath giving them the strength and speed of a pack of hounds.
Wildly the young man rode towards Tarbolton, sometimes seeming to outdistance his pursuers, sometimes losing ground. At the outskirts of the little town, in a panic and instead of going straight on for the safety of the kirk, he slewed his mare sharply to the left and took the Mossgiel road. Och that was a mistake, as his pursuers simply louped over the hedges and fences and cut the corner. As he rode hard for the bridge over the Water of Fail they were almost upon him.
“Come on, Maggie, come on!” he yelled at his mare, and at last they won and barely passed over the key-stane o’ the brig!
Folk will tell you that neither witch nor warlock can pass over running water. It simply isn’t true. Witches and warlocks can pass over running water as well as you or I. Man and mare’s victory in this particular race was of no effect, for Nannie sprang and grabbed hold of the mare’s tail. The mare pulled up short, and the young man was thrown onto the hard ground, the wind knocked out of him. The next thing he knew was that he was surrounded by that horrid crew, and moreover Nannie was kneeling on his chest, her hands at his throat, her nails like talons digging into his flesh.
“Weel, weel, Rabbie ma doo,” she said, a grin twisting her beauty. “D’ye loo me?”
Oddly, even though he had never been so fearful for his life and for his immortal soul, the young man’s immediate thought was one of irritation. “Damn it,” he said to himself. “No one has called me by that diminutive since my late mother! Is this quine going to insult me before she kills me?”
Just at that moment the eldritch crowd parted, and the piper came and stood over him. The young man was expecting the Devil himself, and indeed that adversary might have seemed more comforting than the one who now looked down upon him. The fact that the piper was a lesser foe than Old McNiven, as we call the cloven-footed one, was not softened by the fact that he was as gruesome to look at. Let me say that he had the aspect of one who had lain a long time in his grave and who had been only lately and hastily disturbed. The young man looked at his grey skin stretched like old parchment over a wooden frame, at his eyeballs which were the colour of sour milk dribbled into ditchwater, at his lips which were eaten away to expose yellow-grey teeth, and he shuddered in total terror. The piper put his bony hands on his hips.
“Do I have the pleasure of addressing Master Robert Burns of Mossgiel, farmer?” he asked, his voice like rats’ claws on dead leaves, his breath stale and rank as the air of a disused charnel house.
“Aye sir, ye do,” answered the young man as bravely and politely as he could. “Do I have the honour of addressing Mister Walter Whiteford, late Laird of Fail?”
“Very late,” said the piper, nodding.
“Would you be so kind as to entreat Miss McDowell here to leave go of me, or I fear I shall have no breath left to address you further.”
“Your having or not having breath is of purely academic interest,” said the piper, nevertheless motioning Nannie to get off the young man’s chest. “Tonight both your life and your immortal soul are forfeit, on account of the vanity and resentment I see in you, as well as for disrupting the business of our unholy Sabbath.”
“Wait, wait,” cried the young man, still prostrate on the ground. “Give me twenty years more life, only twenty, and I swear to you I shall turn this night into one of the best-kent legends. I shall write a poem that will make Nannie as weel-kent you are yourself, Laird of Fail. Give me another twenty years of life!”
The piper-laird laughed. “You are no Doctor Faustus to be asking such favours. I’ll give you seven for your effrontery!”
“Fifteen,” begged the young man. “Fifteen, for the love of God!”
“Twelve,” said the Laird of Fail. “For the love of Satan.”
“Done!” They spat on their palms, the trembling hand of the living shook the cold, desiccated hand of the dead, and there was a ghastly leer upon the face of the Warlock of Fail. The Laird looked around at his followers with something like a triumphant smirk on his face, and as they began to titter and to grab hold of Robert Burns’ arms and legs, the relief in the poet’s mind turned to fear and panic. “My God, my God,” he thought. “What have I done?”
The witches with a “One… two… THREE!” tossed him into the air, and he screamed!
The young man seemed to awake from a nightmare at that moment, for he found himself standing at Mossgiel in front of his own farm, holding the reins of Maggie the mare. Both were sweating. Both were shivering.
Well, he was as good as his word. It took some time but if he worked hard at nothing else he certainly put his soul into his poetry. He took his own folly out of the story, set it some miles away, and made the protagonist a drunkard, but apart from that the tale we know as Tam o’ Shanter became famous amongst all his famous poems. He had his treasure upon earth, and now he has statues and memorials, and pictures everywhere, and a special day set aside for us to celebrate him. But twelve years to the day after his mad ride from the old monastery and his bargain with the Laird of Fail, Robert Burns died. He was thirty-seven.

A reconstruction of the face of Robert Burns, from a skull cast made at the time of his death
You want to know his fate? The fate of Scotland’s national bard is eternal fame, of course. The fate of Robert Burns the resentful brother, the philanderer, the father of illegitimate children, the falsifier of official records, the Freemason envious of those who should have been his brothers, good heavens the Excise Man? You want to know what happened to him? I can’t tell you. No, I won’t tell you. I shall however give you a hint. There was a tall, proud ship which bore the nickname by which he had called his young, unholy dancing partner. A few years ago – mark this well – it burned!
There’s a price to pay for everything, you see.

In the days of the old British Empire, two colonial types were sitting on a Verandah somewhere in Malaya, sipping their pink gins and watching the day end.
The sun which during the afternoon had been a harsh and dazzling glare of white had consolidated to a disc of tangerine low in the sky. It rode on the horizon clouds, and its slanted rays turned the little breakers on the strand first to vanilla, then to lemon, then to copper. It kissed the far lip of the sea, sending a fan of reflections back across the miles of water. As that disc dulled to red and began to curtsey below the world’s edge, the sky faded from aquamarine to navy blue. Venus, in her peace and beauty, graced the sky by appearing at a wink, and, as if she were a herald, a million-million other stars were suddenly scattered onto the evening like diamonds onto an indigo velvet cape. Soon only a ribbon of red remained at the horizon. The sea’s lapping at the sand hushed to a repetitive whisper, the breeze captured the sudden scent of moon-seeking flowers, and the liquid notes of a bird’s call floated in from the plantation. Then the remains of sunlight evaporated with the last cloud, and a crescent moon was suspended away to the side of this heady panorama.
“Not bad, eh?” said one ex-pat to the other.
“There’s no need to rave about it like a ruddy poet, old man,” came the reply.
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, 2012, dir. Peter Jackson, New Line / Wingnut / MGM.
Reviewed by Marie Marshall

Film poster presumed (c) MGM, reproduced under ‘fair use’.
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey – or, as I have been calling it lately, Lord of the Rings: The Phantom Menace. Those of you familiar with prequels will appreciate what I’m driving at. There are problems with making prequels, and this film suffers from them all. Let me say straight away that it is nonetheless watchable. There are some good reasons for going to see it.
Good reason No.1 – you have a crush on Cate Blanchett or Hugo Weaver (and who could possibly blame you!).
Good reason No.2 – you are a Tolkie (Tolkeenie?) and a Middle-Earth completist, and I mean the kind of person who has even downloaded a hooky copy of the Air New Zealand in-flight safety video. In which case how could you miss this film!
Good reason No.3 – you are a fan of British and British-based actors in general, in which case this film is an absolute feast for you. You will sit there saying things like, “Hey – isn’t that Mitchell out of Being Human? Isn’t that the bloke who played Rebus?” Although if you can actually spot Benedict Cumberbatch and Barry Humphries you deserve a prize.
And that’s about it. On that last point, it does fare better than the Harry Potter canon in which the cream of British acting hammed their way to the bank, and who could blame them*. The acting quality is much better. Martin Freeman plays Bilbo Baggins almost exactly as he played Watson to Benedict Cumberbatch’s Sherlock Holmes, but he is believable as a young Ian Holm**. Sylvester McCoy is a thoroughly eccentric Radagast, and again fans will recall his equally eccentric tour of duty as the eponymous Dr Who, so it’s lovely to see him at his craft again.
However, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey does suffer all the ills of a prequel. There is no surprise, no delight in discovering the Shire, Rivendell, and the rest of Middle Earth. We are already familiar with it in the wonderful, broad sweep of the LOTR trilogy, with the musical tropes, and so they appear tired rather than fresh. There is no shock in seeing an orc or a troll for the first time, and in fact there is something tame about the trolls, which takes me on to the next problem.
The Hobbit, the novel on which this film is based, is very different in tone, in target readership, in almost every way from Lord of the Rings. It is very brief, shorter than any one of the three parts of Lord of the Rings, and written with young readers in mind. The three trolls that Bilbo encounters in the book are much less like the hulking, mindless monsters in the film trilogy, more bucolic, calling each other Tom, Bill, and Bert. The new film tries to bridge that gap, and damn near fails. The task is like binding two metal strips together, each of which expands with heat at a different rate, and holding them over a flame. This shows up very clearly in the scene with the trolls round their camp fire. They look sufficiently like the mindless trolls from the trilogy, but smaller, more like a trio of obese skinheads. This is a symptom of trying to marry very different books into a single experience – it doesn’t quite work.
The brevity of the book suggests to me that it could easily have been made into a single film, maybe even a stand-alone film. Stretching it out into two feature-length films is a mistake. As a result, and to provide extra action and spectacle, the film-makers have added elements which were not in the book. Unfortunately that complicates and obscures the plot. There is, for example, a back-story and sub-plot concerning Thorin and a one-handed, albino orc-warrior. It’s padding. Galadriel, Radagast, and Saruman do not appear in the book, but they do make appearances in the film. Sylvester McCoy’s cameo is, as I have said, eccentric, charmingly silly. Christopher Lee, on the other hand, plays Saruman entirely seated; he seems, as he is, much older than he did playing the same part supposedly many years into the future. The book glosses over the conflict between the shadowy ‘Necromancer’ (‘Sauron’ in Lord of the Rings) and implies that Gandalf’s order of wizards, including Radagast and Saruman we must assume, fought as one against this menace. However, the film-makers couldn’t resist giving us a disingenuously proleptic glimpse of ‘Saruman the Bad’. Again, padding, and I’m afraid the stuffing is falling out of it.
Another cameo appearance that simply doesn’t work: Elijah Wood, in real life, looks a good ten years older than he did when he first appeared as Frodo. Then he was cute, now no amount of soft focus can hide the fact that his face has matured. The result is that we are treated to seeing Frodo supposedly several years younger but obviously not. No, doesn’t work, bad padding again.
Maybe it is because I am more used to seeing Lord of the Rings in home DVD format, but I also felt that there was something lacking in the film quality, some lack of definition or clarity. It seems murkier than the trilogy. The film ends at a half-way point in the novel, leaving room for the next film to bridge the gap to Lord of the Rings. I do not know what elements of the story will be left out of No.2 (maybe the part played by Beorn the Skin-changer) nor what will be grafted in (presumably the conflict with the Necromancer and a resolution of Thorin’s feud with the pale orc), but I have my worries.
There are a few good moments of comedy in the film, however, mainly surrounding Thorin’s band of dwarves, who draw as much from Terry Pratchett as they do from Tolkien. I won’t spoil it for you, but watch out for the line, “That could have been worse.” Also it is available in 3D at the cinema, which is still a sufficiently new technology to be enjoyable, so it is worth seeing before you become jaded with the effect.
Overall I think it’s worth paying for a cinema ticket nevertheless (go for a cheap matinee), and worth buying the DVD after it has been out for a few months and the price has come down a little. You could iron to it. If I were to give the Lord of the Rings trilogy five stars, I would award this three. Not bad, Mr Jackson, but you could do much better.
__________
*There were some golden moments in the Harry Potter films too, though if you haven’t seen any of them, take my advice and only see the ones in which Jason Isaacs appears – he is the only cast member who doesn’t ham it up, and as a result he is utterly, chillingly convincing – and the one in which Hermione decks Draco Malfoy with a right hook. Shout ‘Expelliarmus’ all you like, that was the most magical moment in all that series of films.
**Except maybe to those of us old enough to remember the young Ian Holm.

(c) P’Kaboo Publishers
There is a new anthology of short stories just released – especially for those of you with Kindle, and just in time for Christmas too. It’s called Mercury Silver, and you can get it from US or UK Amazon, or as a pdf direct from P’kaboo Publishers. It includes two of my stories, ‘Dragonslayers – a fable’ and ‘Memoirs of a Chief Replicator Technician’, the latter being a tribute to the late Gene Roddenberry. Other authors featured include Douglas Pearce, Emma L Briant, Leslie Hyla Winton Noble, Lois S Bassen, Lucy P Naylor, Lyz Russo, and Nick Legg. Check it out (as they say)!
I have been having fun answering some penetrating questions in an email conversation with Samuel Snoek-Brown. You may recall I interviewed him a while ago? Well, he repaid the compliment and the resulting interview is here. Also there’s a slightly lighter interview by Diane Tibert here. Enjoy both.